Suggestions
Zack Kanter
Founder & CEO at Stedi
Zack Kanter is the Founder and CEO of Stedi, a developer-focused electronic data interchange (EDI) platform that facilitates automated, high-volume integrations. He established Stedi in 2016, and under his leadership, the company has raised approximately $75 million in funding from notable investors including Addition, Stripe, and First Round Capital. As of 2023, Stedi reported a revenue of $1.4 million and employs a team of 32 people, primarily in engineering roles.23
Before founding Stedi, Kanter was the founder of Proforged, a company that was later acquired by Huron Capital. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing from Rutgers University, which he attended from 2003 to 2007.24 Kanter is based in Boulder, Colorado, and is known for his insights into entrepreneurship and technology.15
Highlights
The wealth tax discourse is interesting because tech opponents seem to think that it’s driven by a simple misunderstanding about the mechanics of unrealized capital gains, and are largely focused on attempting to explain how an unrealized capital gains tax would force founders to prematurely liquidate their ownership interests in their companies.
Proponents of wealth taxes, on the other hand, are largely focused on reversing ‘wealth inequality.’ Startups have asymmetric outcomes that are governed by power laws – in other words, they’re a primary engine of wealth inequality. Billionaires are the enemy, and an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure – the fact that such a wealth tax would force illiquid founders to sell off their ownership stakes as the company becomes potentially valuable is a feature, not a bug. The argument that this will destroy companies and therefore jobs doesn’t hold water because they don’t think there’s anything particularly special about founder-CEOs, nor the Great Man Theory of history more broadly. If you leave the state before starting a company, the state is better off because you’re exploiting workers anyways. If you stay in the state and the company fails after you lose control, it was destined to fail regardless. And if it’s ultimately successful, if they don’t approve of how your company makes money, someone with more radical views might execute your replacement in the streets and the rank and file will fall somewhere between ‘the assassin had some good points’ and lionizing them as a folk hero.
While there are a few people who want a wealth tax and think that success is great and startups are great and billionaires are great and just don’t have a good grasp of unrealized capital gains, for the vast, vast majority, preventing the outsized financial success of successful founders – aka ‘billionaires’ – is the primary intent, not an unintended consequence.
One exciting thing about being alive today is that there are just a couple more tax loopholes to introduce and then figure out how to close and we’ll have this whole tax code buttoned up.
