Suggestions
Quinn Slack
CEO at Sourcegraph
Quinn Slack, Board Member at Hack Club
Quinn Slack is a prominent figure in the tech industry, serving as the CEO and co-founder of Sourcegraph, a leading code intelligence platform. He is also a Board Member of Hack Club, a national nonprofit that brings coding clubs to high schools across the country.
Professional Background
-
CEO and Co-founder, Sourcegraph (2013 - Present): Quinn co-founded Sourcegraph in 2013 and has been leading the company as CEO since its inception. Sourcegraph uses AI and machine learning to help developers better understand, fix, and automate their code.34
-
Board Member, Hack Club (2015 - Present): Quinn has been a Board Member of Hack Club since 2015. Hack Club is a nonprofit that empowers teenagers to learn coding and build real-world projects.12
-
Co-founder, Blend Labs (2012 - 2013): Prior to Sourcegraph, Quinn co-founded Blend Labs, a platform that transformed consumer banking experiences and streamlined workflows for teams.4
-
Forward Deployed Engineer, Palantir Technologies (2011 - 2012): Quinn also worked as a Forward Deployed Engineer at Palantir Technologies.5
Education
Quinn Slack studied Computer Science at Stanford University, where he earned his Bachelor of Science degree.36
Personal Life
Quinn Slack lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.6 His email address is qslack@gmail.com, and he can be found on Twitter, GitHub, and LinkedIn under the username @sqs.6
In summary, Quinn Slack is a highly accomplished tech entrepreneur and leader, serving as the CEO of Sourcegraph and a Board Member of Hack Club. His expertise in computer science and his commitment to making coding more accessible have made him a prominent figure in the industry.
Highlights
The new metric “Off-the-Rails Cost” was shocking and useful for comparing Sonnet, Gemini, and Opus.
We defined criteria for a “wasted thread”, such as when the model starts spitting out tons of leaked thinking or repeating tokens. Usually this means you need to abandon and revert the thread.
17.8% of all costs incurred by Gemini users in Amp were on “wasted threads”, more than 2x worse than Sonnet and almost 8x worse than Opus. This goes a long way to making Gemini less relatively cheap (and effective).
This kind of analysis helps us make Amp better and provide privacy-preserving feedback to the model makers. We may bring this into the product as well, to automatically detect and remediate “wasted threads” where possible (and give credits, of which we’ve already given many for Gemini and long-context Sonnet).
You can now see how much @AmpCode free mode daily allowance you have left, and when it resets.
Happy coding! https://t.co/RGFANYzHq7

