Devindra Hardawar - Senior Editor - Engadget - LinkedIn

Devindra Hardawar, Senior Editor - Engadget

Devindra Hardawar's Profile | Engadget, The Filmcast ... - Muck Rack

Co-Founder at Eight Sleep

Alexandra Zatarain

Presentation, communication, persuasion, influence

Michelle Bowden CSP

Senior Strategy Manager at the LEGO Group | Trustee at NSPCC | Co Founder of Yours In Scouting

Sheanna Patelmaster

Senior Product Manager (Insurance, Real Estate, Financial Tech)  -  Fmr. Corporate Real Estate Attorney  -  Experience leading all phases of the product lifecycle

Niven Prasad

Mobile Editor at Trusted Reviews

Lewis Painter

Senior Editor at Engadget

Tech's biggest winners in 2024

When Intel debuted its <a href="https://www.engadget.com/intel-arc-a750-a770-review-mid-range-gpu-rivals-nvidia-amd-130032507.html">first Arc video cards two years ago</a>, I was more than a little skeptical. Could a company that famously gave up on its last major desktop GPU project in 2009 actually make a dent in a market dominated by NVIDIA and AMD? Well, when I reviewed them in 2022, the Arc A750 and A770 turned out better than I thought, though they were also held back by Intel's poor drivers. But it seems Intel has learned from its mistakes. 
The new $250 <a href="https://www.engadget.com/gaming/pc/intel-unveils-its-budget-battlemage-arc-gpus-with-xess2-ai-features-140027123.html">Arc B580 </a>performs better than AMD's low-end Radeon 7600, and it can even tangle a bit with NVIDIA when it comes to budget ray tracing. The only question is if it's worth investing in an Intel video card given its <a href="https://www.engadget.com/computing/firing-pat-gelsinger-doesnt-solve-intels-problems-173420381.html">rocky corporate outlook</a>. But for such a cheap video card, with a price that harkens back to the early 2000s, the risk may be worth it. 

 
The B580 marks the debut of Intel's second-generation Arc Xe2 GPUs, and it'll be joined by the $219 B570 next month. Based on their specs alone, it's easy to see why they're compelling for budget games. The B580 features 20 Xe cores, 20 ray tracing units and a faster clock speed than the previous Arc cards. Most importantly, though, it's rocking 12GB of VRAM with a 192-bit memory interface, giving it more than enough room to pump out 1440p gameplay. 
The $299 NVIDIA RTX 4060, in comparison, is stuck with 8GB of VRAM and a far more limited 128-bit interface. Even the RTX 4060 Ti sports that meager amount of VRAM, limiting both of those GPUs mostly to 1080p gameplay (especially if you wanted a bit of ray tracing). <a href="https://www.engadget.com/amds-rx-7600-graphics-card-promises-smooth-1080p-gaming-for-lower-269-price-130024012.html">AMD's Radeon RX 7600</a>, which goes for around $269, is also burdened with 8GB of RAM and weaker ray tracing performance than NVIDIA and Intel's cards. 
While Intel has a clear hardware advantage, timing is once again a major concern. The Arc B580 launched as we're preparing for CES 2025, where both NVIDIA and AMD are expected to show off new desktop GPUs. Given NVIDIA's ever-increasing prices, I wouldn't bet on seeing an RTX 5060 around $250, but AMD is another story. It's been trying to make an impact in the low- and mid-range GPU market for years, and <a href="https://www.pcworld.com/article/2451584/amd-exec-says-radeon-will-prioritize-market-share-not-high-end-gpus.html">that’s reportedly still the case </a>with its RDNA 4 cards. There's a good chance we'll eventually see some sort of inexpensive next-gen GPU from AMD. 
<figure>
 <img alt="Intel Battlemage GPUs" src="https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded-images/2024-12/b7bb4f21-b12f-11ef-bfbf-8b5768bedd8a" style="height: 1002px; width: 1908px;" />
 <figcaption></figcaption>
 <div class="photo-credit">
 Intel
 </div>
</figure> 
If you need to build a budget gaming rig in the next few months or so, though, the Arc B580 will serve you well. In my testing, it scored slightly higher than the RTX 4060 Ti in 3DMark's Timespy Extreme Benchmark, and it was also noticeably faster than the Radeon 7600. The B580 shone even brighter with ray tracing. I hit a 58 fps average in the Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark running at 1080p with Ultra graphics settings and mid-range ray tracing. The Radeon 7600, on the other hand, sometimes struggled to stay above 40 fps with similar settings. 
<table>
 <tbody>
 <tr>
 <th>GPU </th>
 <th>Timespy Extreme </th>
 <th>3Dmark Speedway </th>
 <th>Port Royal Ray Tracing </th>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <td>Intel Arc B580 </td>
 <td>7,287 </td>
 <td>2,443 </td>
 <td>7,872 </td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <td>Intel Arc A770 </td>
 <td>6,718 </td>
 <td>N/A </td>
 <td>6,960 </td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <td>NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti </td>
 <td>6,599 </td>
 <td>3,217 </td>
 <td>8,170 </td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <td>AMD Radeon 7600 </td>
 <td>5,526 </td>
 <td>1,969 </td>
 <td>5,478 </td>
 </tr>
 </tbody>
</table> 
I was genuinely surprised by how well the Arc B580 tackled 1440p gaming. In Dragon Age: The Veilguard, I hit 70 fps on average with high graphics settings, mid-range ray tracing and Intel's XeSS upscaling flipped on. That's better performance than you'll see on the $700 PlayStation 5 Pro (though admittedly, Sony's PSSR AI upscaling might look better to your eyes). I also hit 85 fps on average while playing Halo Infinite in 1440p with maxed out graphics, which was slightly better than the 4060 Ti. While we're used to budget cards being mainly limited to 1080p gaming, the Arc B580's additional memory clearly makes it well suitedfor 1440p. 
 
<figure>
 <img alt="Intel Arc B580 rear ports" src="https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded-images/2024-12/dcfba4d0-befc-11ef-bffd-2ed81e77d980" style="height: 2919px; width: 4963px;" />
 <figcaption></figcaption>
 <div class="photo-credit">
 Photo by Devindra Hardawar/Engadget
 </div>
</figure> 
Still, there are benefits that the competition offers. NVIDIA's RTX GPUs can also work with its specialized apps, like NVIDIA Broadcaster, which can clean up your audio and video for streams and recordings. Additionally, NVIDIA's DLSS 3 upscaling is available on over 500 games, while Intel's XeSS <a href="https://wccftech.com/intels-xess-upscaling-technology-support-over-200-games/">just cracked 200</a>. And then there’s the driver issue: NVIDIA has decades of experience crafting solid GPU software, whereas Intel is still recovering from its recent driver missteps. At least the XeSS 2 AI upscaling seems more useful than AMD's FSR 3 (FidelityFX Super Resolution), as Intel's tech looks dramatically better and can often increase a game's performance by 30 percent or more. 
The Arc B580 also survived several hours of benchmarking and gaming without any hardware or driver issues. When I first tested the Arc A750 and A770, they would often crash within an hour of testing. Intel's software has clearly made some progress. The B580 reference model I tested also stayed relatively cool under load, and it never surpassed 64 degrees celsius (which also kept its two large fans from ever making much noise). While there will be third-party cards available, I was also impressed by Intel’s reference design: The B580 feels premium and sturdy, not cheap and plasticky like many other budget GPUs. 
<figure>
 <img alt="Intel Arc B580 label view" src="https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded-images/2024-12/dcfbcbe2-befc-11ef-ad3b-feb967e47de4" style="height: 2976px; width: 5186px;" />
 <figcaption></figcaption>
 <div class="photo-credit">
 Photo by Devindra Hardawar/Engadget
 </div>
</figure> 
At this point, it seems like Intel is already having <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/12/17/24323888/intel-arc-b580-sold-out-availability">trouble keeping the Arc B580 in stock</a>, a rare good problem for the <a href="https://www.engadget.com/computing/firing-pat-gelsinger-doesnt-solve-intels-problems-173420381.html">beleaguered chip giant</a>. It’s easy to see why gamers are smitten: It delivers solid 1080p and 1440p performance for most new titles, even with a bit of ray tracing. Finally, there’s a viable $250 GPU that doesn’t make you feel like you’re desperately behind the pack. It’s a clear win for Intel – at least until we see what’s new from AMD.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/pc/intel-arc-b580-review-the-new-king-of-250-gpus-for-now-200047482.html?src=rss

Intel Arc B580 review: The new king of $250 GPUs (for now)

This week, tech deals include discounts on gear from Apple, Anker, Ninja, Nintendo and more.

The M2 MacBook Air is cheaper than ever at $700, plus the rest of this 
week's best tech deals

We finally got an iPad Mini refresh, and it's not particularly exciting. But that's fine!

Engadget Podcast: The new iPad Mini is boring and that’s okay!

The biggest news stories this morning: Apple's preparing a week of announcements, the UN gets gloomy on the climate and we review the Galaxy S24 FE.

The Morning After: Apple’s Week of Announcements starts Monday

Devindra Hardawar on X: "Join us LIVE on the @Engadget Podcast ...

Get to Know Devindra Hardawar, Engadget - YouTube

Devindra Hardawar

Facebook

LinkedIn

Twitter

Devindra Hardawar (@devindra@mastodon.social)

Devindra Hardawar is a prominent technology journalist and the Senior Editor at Engadget, where he has been working since November 2014. His ro...

Suggestions

Devindra Hardawar

Senior Editor at Engadget

Background and Experience

Interests and Contributions

Online Presence

Highlights

Related Questions

Location

People also viewed

Tags

Mutual Connections

People also viewed

Tags

Mutual Connections