Suggestions
Carter Williams
Carter Williams is the CEO and Managing Director of iSelect Fund, a venture capital firm he founded in 2014.12 Here are some key details about his background and career:
Education and Early Career
Carter Williams holds an M.B.A. from the MIT Sloan School and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.1 He began his career as an engineer at McDonnell Douglas before moving into leadership roles at Boeing.12
Experience at Boeing
At Boeing, Carter:
- Managed R&D and started Boeing Ventures1
- Led Boeing's technology planning process as part of Boeing Phantom Works1
- Founded and managed Boeing Ventures1
Entrepreneurial Ventures
After leaving Boeing, Carter:
- Served as President of Gridlogix, a startup that was successfully acquired by Johnson Controls in 200812
- Was Senior Managing Director at Progress Partners, an energy and technology investment banking firm1
- Worked as a Managing Partner at Open Innovation Ventures1
iSelect Fund
In 2014, Carter founded iSelect Fund in St. Louis.2 As CEO and Managing Director, he:
- Focuses on investments at the convergence of agtech and human health2
- Has built a portfolio of about 80 companies, split evenly between agtech and health sectors2
- Provides qualified individual investors access to early-stage private venture investments3
Additional Roles and Interests
Carter is also:
- Past President and Founder of the MIT Corporate Venturing Consortium1
- Co-founder of the MIT Entrepreneurship Society1
- A writer on innovation topics, publishing on LinkedIn and a substack newsletter called Creative Destruction2
Throughout his career, Carter has directly managed over $600 million in early-stage ventures and corporate research, resulting in several billion dollars of new product revenues.12
Highlights
This post created controversy that also is a lesson of what Creative Destruction looks like. I suggest reading the comments.
This thread captures exactly what I hoped the article would surface. Spencer's Jevons paradox point is sharp. Andy's fact-checking is the kind of accountability the new model needs. And the tension between them illustrates the real story.
We're watching Schumpeter's gale from inside the storm. It's messy. The content quality varies wildly. Political opportunists grab whatever amplifies their message. Some of these new investigators are rigorous. Others are reckless. That's not a bug. That's what pre-dominant design looks like.
Before Ford, there were hundreds of car companies. Most built unreliable machines. Many were outright scams. The industry was chaos. Then the market clarified. Ford didn't win because he was first. He won because he figured out the architecture that scaled: standardized parts, assembly line, price point the mass market could afford. The dominant design emerged, and the industry consolidated around it.
Investigative journalism is in its "hundred car companies" phase right now. Nick Shirley is one of those companies. So is Matt Stoller. So is The Antifraud Company with its VC-backed bounty hunters. Most will fail. Some will be exposed as frauds themselves. But somewhere in this chaos, someone is building the Ford: the model that combines reach, accuracy, accountability, and sustainable economics.
Hayek would say the market is sending signals. The 135 million views are a signal. The instant fact-checking is a signal. The political co-opting is a signal. The question for entrepreneurs isn't whether this disruption is good or bad. It's: what architecture emerges from the chaos?
Who builds the dominant design?
I live in Harbor Springs MI. That's 1.5 hours to Traverse City for any flight. So I talk to AI the entire drive.
By the time I land, I've usually got a 10-page OpenAI deep research doc waiting in my inbox. By the time I'm home, I've refined it further. Except for the stop at Friske's for apple butter.
This post shows what happens when you take that process further. I fed 30 sources into NotebookLM and asked it to generate a presentation, infographic, video, and audio explainer on our 20-year strategy to end chronic disease.
Round trip: 90 minutes. First run was actually good.
I posted the infographic on LinkedIn to see if the message landed. 2,300 impressions. 36 comments. Not bad for a first draft built on top of a few thousand hours of prior thinking.
The prompts are below. Including the "think like Elon Musk" first-principles prompt I run on every platform. Use it if you want.
